Tomorrowism Blog

So little talent, so much pretension.

Home » Archives » May 2004 » A market in everything

[Previous entry: "Dislike registering for newspaper websites?"] [Next entry: "Navy Cross Honoree, Marine Capt. Brian R. Chontosh"]

05/14/2004: "A market in everything"


(Title phrase stolen from Marginal Revolution).

I really like the concept of Intrade (hat tip: Marginal Revolution). It's a cross between a diverse stock market and a low cost sportsgambling book.

You think President Bush will be reelected? Pay $5.79 now, and get $10 on election day. If you're wrong, you get nothing back. Think he will not be relected? Collect $5.68 now; you will owe nothing on election day if you are right, you'll owe $10 if you are wrong.

Either way, you'll have to pay $.04 to buy or sell the contract. I don't know about the margin requirements. That is; if you make a provisional promise to pay $10, I don't know how much of that $10 you have to keep in your account. I gather that the higher the cost of the contract, the more you have to have in your account.

You can also bet on the Democratic Vice Presidential candidate (Gov. Bill Richardson and Sen Hillary Rodham would be my bets), whether Secretary Rumsfeld will keep his job through June, when Osama will be captured, and whether or not the Dow will rise 25 points tomorrow.

Just like the real stock market, more active traders can buy low and sell high. If you think President Bush is about to take a dip in the polls, you can sell Bush-will-be-reelected contracts now and buy them back later at a lower price. Note that to break even, the price would have to drop $.19 or so; you pay $.08 for commission, and there is currently a $.11 ($5.79-$5.68) spread. Or, sell now for $5.64 ($5.68 - $.04 commission) and buy later for $5.64 ($5.60 + $.04 commission).

Replies: 1 Comment

on Sunday, May 16th, Alex said

I think some political strategists tried to introduce this before, except they picked a bad topic. I heard something on CNN about an attempt to contract different types of terrorist attacks so the government could see which ones were the most likely. Problems: (1)it makes a mockery of terrorism, and (2)members of U.S. terror cells could participate and throw off the analysis. (Remember that they are criminals, and lying would carry less weight than jail time.)

Home
Archives

Alan's Regular Reads:
Chicago Boyz
Michelle Malkin
Byrne's Eye View
Tim Blair
Jane Galt
Marginal Revolution
Lilek's Daily Bleat
Belmont Club
Natalie Solent
Uncensored Blog Madness

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes

For the Intellect:
Think Again!
Andrew's Excel Tips

Project Free Iran
Command Post
Blog Runner
Search MLive
I search The Ann Arbor News for "Police Beat"
Detroit News Sports
Opinion Journal
Nealz Nuze
Election Projection
New at Snopes
Dave Barry's Blog
Day by Day

More

News Searches: (provisional) alleged
condemn

May 2004
SMTWTFS
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Valid XHTML 1.0!

Powered By Greymatter