Tomorrowism Blog

So little talent, so much pretension.

Home » Archives » July 2004 » Do we need a higher level of political honesty?

[Previous entry: "F9/11 Fact Checked"] [Next entry: "Moving on in The Middle East? Iraq vs. Iran?"]

07/07/2004: "Do we need a higher level of political honesty?"


I'm wading through the comments to Megan aka Jane's rant, and came across this one:

Misleading half truths are punishable as securities fraud under the securities laws. If "Farenheit 911" were a stock prospectus, Michael Moore would be going to jail for securities fraud. His "legalistic" evasions - that what he said was literally true, would be of no avail: the omission of facts necessary to make the statement made not misleading constitutes fraud. Q.E.D.
Posted by: DBL on July 7, 2004 08:36 AM

Why not create a special class of statement? We could create some keywords such as "I swear this to be a special truth." A false statement so sworn would invoke perjury type penalties.

I'm sure there would be difficulties in defining and enforcing such a statute. But it would focus political debate on honesty. Who knows, it might even make political debate more honest.

Home
Archives

Alan's Regular Reads:
Chicago Boyz
Michelle Malkin
Byrne's Eye View
Tim Blair
Jane Galt
Marginal Revolution
Lilek's Daily Bleat
Belmont Club
Natalie Solent
Uncensored Blog Madness

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes

For the Intellect:
Think Again!
Andrew's Excel Tips

Project Free Iran
Command Post
Blog Runner
Search MLive
I search The Ann Arbor News for "Police Beat"
Detroit News Sports
Opinion Journal
Nealz Nuze
Election Projection
New at Snopes
Dave Barry's Blog
Day by Day

More

News Searches: (provisional) alleged
condemn

July 2004
SMTWTFS
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Valid XHTML 1.0!

Powered By Greymatter