Tomorrowism Blog

So little talent, so much pretension.

Home » Archives » July 2004 » Insidious sexism? Lies, Dang Lies, and Stats.

[Previous entry: "Kerry ignorant on finer points of national security"] [Next entry: "Oil For Food"]

07/13/2004: "Insidious sexism? Lies, Dang Lies, and Stats."


Via a Think Again comment, a study about a 1973 Cal-Berkeley sex discrimination suit. Check the table at the very bottom. Of the six departments, each and every one admitted a higher percentage of female applicants than male applicants. Yet as a whole, the university admitted a lower percentage of female applicants than male applicants.

Such is the danger of lawsuits by statistics. If someone can think of a nice, pithy inference to draw, please add it to the comments.

Home
Archives

Alan's Regular Reads:
Chicago Boyz
Michelle Malkin
Byrne's Eye View
Tim Blair
Jane Galt
Marginal Revolution
Lilek's Daily Bleat
Belmont Club
Natalie Solent
Uncensored Blog Madness

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes

For the Intellect:
Think Again!
Andrew's Excel Tips

Project Free Iran
Command Post
Blog Runner
Search MLive
I search The Ann Arbor News for "Police Beat"
Detroit News Sports
Opinion Journal
Nealz Nuze
Election Projection
New at Snopes
Dave Barry's Blog
Day by Day

More

News Searches: (provisional) alleged
condemn

July 2004
SMTWTFS
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Valid XHTML 1.0!

Powered By Greymatter